What is Religion?
Religion is a murky, elusive, and many-headed beast. The very word itself defies definition. Oh, you can look it up in any dictionary readily enough, but all that will tell you is its common usage in the English language. People throw around words all the time without truly stopping to consider what the dictionary says they mean.
Anthropologists have been studying religion for as long as the science has existed, and even today, it is hard to come up with a good definition that covers all phenomena in all cultures that could be considered "religion." Is it belief in a deity? Buddhism and Taosim are both major religions without supreme deities. Belief in a higher power, then? That depends on what you consider "higher power" to mean. There are plenty of indigenous religions out there with beings more powerful than mortals, who are nevertheless the butt of jokes. In the end, the best that anthropology can come up with for a working definition is "belief that the world is more than what it seems." That, it seems, is about all we can agree on as a species - that there is more to life than what you can see, hear, smell, taste, and touch.
Okay, fair enough. But that kind of a definition could mean almost anything. And when you look at all of the beauty, horror, passion and struggle that religion has given to us, it seems to lack the kind of depth one would expect when trying to pinpoint just what "religion" means, or is.
According to the Online Etymology Dictionary, English inherits the word "religion" from the Anglo-French religiun, whose mother was the Old French religion (meaning a religious or monastic community), which originally was born in Rome as a Latin word.
Now, this Latin word - religionem - simply means "respect for what is sacred." Therefore, if you have a belief that something is sacred, and you have a means of displaying respect for it, you have a religion.
One might imagine the first "religion" to consist of nothing more than places or objects that were avoided, since fear is the most primal form of respect, and avoidance is the only respectful way of dealing with something fearful (the other option being confrontation, but would you want to take on spirits armed only with a flint spear?)
The definition of religionem is a pretty fair try at a universal definition of what religion is, but not good enough, because it uses another ambiguous term - sacred. How do you know something is "sacred?" What differentiates something "sacred" from something that is merely important, or dangerous?
The OED goes on to say that religionem has two possible roots. One root leads to relegare - which is a combination of re- (again) and legare (read). At its heart, the word "religion" could simply mean "that which is repeated." Indeed, you sometimes hear of people who do something "religiously," meaning they repeat it faithfully, without fail, no matter how inconvenient it may be from time to time.
To be sure, repeated performances of any kind tend to take on ritualistic qualities. We all have our little rituals we perform, regardless of our religious beliefs - morning and work routines, victory dances and displays at sports matches, or social events such as fairs or conventions that we attend annually. All of these are ritualistic. But what makes the difference between a secular ritual and a religious one?
The second possible root of the Latin word religionem may hold a clue, and that is that religionem may come from religare, meaning "to bind fast." According to the OED, the specific type of bond this refers to is a social one, an obligation which creates and maintains a relationship. Religionem may also be related to religiens, "careful," which adds the implied dimension of importance.
Here, then, are several basic aspects of religion in general, hidden in the origins of the word itself: a repeated performance, done for the sake of creating social bonds, which must be executed with care.
Given this framework, it is not hard to see how any important secular ceremony could take on religious or near-religious overtones to some people. There is a lot put on the line during these rituals, and if something were to go wrong or, worse, someone were to deliberately disrupt the proceedings, those involved generally feel anger, shock, embarrassment, and often times shame because the pride of their community or way of life has been marred.
Of course, hidden behind the overt actions of a particular ritual are a whole series of beliefs and values which link together with a larger worldview. Rituals are the tip of an invisible social-spiritual iceberg. Just as there are symbols in any ritual - gestures, props, costumes, etc - a ritual itself can be seen as a symbol upholding and validating an entire way of life.
When considered in this light, it is not surprising that recent contentions over some public symbols and rituals have been so heated. Examples include the displaying of the ten commandments outside a public court house in Montgomery, Alabama in 2003; the use and display of the Confederate flag, the use of Native Americans as mascots for sports teams, and the proper framing of the United States pledge of allegiance for use in public schools (whether the words "under God," should remain or be removed).
So, is religion nothing more than a set of rituals which have been given a special significance within a community? History would seem to suggest that the beliefs tied to religious rituals are less important than the rituals themselves in some regard. For example, when the nature-focused religions of Europe were replaced with Christianity, most of the rituals were simply appropriated and adapted to Christian teachings. Mardi Gras, Easter, May Day, Halloween and even Christmas all owe their modern form to this process.
Islam, too, uses this technique as a policy for conversion. For instance, the particular rituals practiced by rural Muslims in North Africa are far older than the presence of Islam in the area. When these peoples were converted, they were allowed to keep the rituals they had always used. The rituals were simply practiced for a different purpose. Thus, the social cohesion of these societies was maintained even after such a radical change.
In the end, it may be easier to describe what it is religion does rather than what, exactly, it is. If you accept the existence of God, the same could be said about God. And there, I believe, is where the science of deduction can and should be applied.
To be continued....
(References: Online Etymology Dictionary: http://www.etymonline.com/; Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_Day)
